British Courts Not Supporting British Design
(Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd – 2011)
“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes”
- Sir Robin Jacob , Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd  EWCA Civ 1206, 27 October 2011
The Court of Appeal has upheld an earlier High Court decision in Dyson v Vax. It agreed that Vax had not infringed Dyson’s intellectual property by designing and producing the Mach Zen vacuum cleaner. Although it looked quite similar the court concluded that it “produced a different overall impression on the informed user” (this being the test for infringement) and was therefore not in breach.
Why is this decision important? Like all registered design owners Dyson has the exclusive right to use its registered design for a maximum of 25 years following registration. Dyson registered the design in 1994 so had thought that no competitors would be able to make a similar looking and functioning vacuum cleaner until at least 2019. What this decision has shown, however, is that simply registering the overall design of a product is no longer enough. Such a broad registration will not give sufficient protection to those aspects of a product that really do require safeguarding. Although the products were clearly similar in function and design the court concluded that “what really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes”, and in this instance it saw too many differences. Overall, the appeal judges characterized the registered design as producing a visual impression that is “smooth, curving and elegant” whilst that of the Mach Zen is “rugged, angular and industrial”. This, it concluded, gave a “different overall impression on the informed user”.
Myers Lister Price Corporate and Commercial Department: Intellectual Property, offer a full registered design service, from advising on the strengths of a registered design application, through the registration itself and onto protection of the design and enforcement of the intellectual property rights. As we have learnt from the Dyson case, simply registering an overall design of a product may no longer be enough to protect the product from being copied. We would advise our clients (as the UK and EU laws allow) to not only protect the design of a whole product but to also consider protecting specific parts of a product. Our experienced intellectual property team are on hand to advise what aspects of a design may be worth protecting and how this can best be done for you.
If you have any intellectual property enquiries please get in touch with Stephen Attree or Awena Parry, our Intellectual Property Solicitors at Myers Lister Price Solicitors on 0845 0738 445 or email email@example.com
Latest MLP Solicitors News
- September 8th, 2014Employment Law Update for the week ending 5 September 2014
- September 3rd, 2014Data protection breaches can result in monetary penalty notices being issued –what are these and how can your business avoid them?
A Monetary Penalty Notice is a notice requiring a data controller to pay a fine set by the Commissioner. The amount of the MPN determined by the Commissioner must not … Read more
- September 2nd, 2014Family Business Succession and Planning.
I’ve recently finished an E-book soon to be published on Family Business succession and planning. One of the key elements of the book is the importance of planning. Planning succession … Read more
- September 1st, 2014Employment Law Update for the week ending 29 August 2014
It’s time for MLP’s quick round up of the key talking points in employment law for the week ending 29 August 2014. News Consultation on closing potential loopholes in the … Read more
- August 29th, 2014The Current State of the Property Market
Where are the regional property hotspots?We’ve witnessed the ongoing growth of the UK housing market in recent months but is it beginning to lose momentum? June saw a rise … Read more
- August 27th, 2014Pre-nuptial agreements are not binding
Although the government is yet to legislate to give pre-nuptial agreements automatic legal recognition in England and Wales, the courts have for several years adopted the position that those who … Read more
- August 21st, 2014Considering selling or merging your PR or Digital Agency?
We act for a significant number of PR and Digital Agencies and from our experience of mergers and acquisitions over the years, I set out the top 6 questions you … Read more
- August 20th, 2014Financial claims are extinguished by decree absolute – Common Misconception
Here is the third in our series of common misconceptions around family law. This week we are tackling the issue of financial claims being extinguished by decree absolute. In a … Read more
- August 20th, 2014Dealing with grief when a loved one dies
“I’ve nothing against death, I just don’t want to be there when it happens….” Woody Allen. Grief is the natural process of reaction and adjustment to loss and change. … Read more
- August 19th, 2014Companies reveal gender pay gap
It’s time for MLP’s quick round up of the key talking points in employment law for the week ending 15 August 2014. Employment law news Just four companies reveal gender … Read more
- August 13th, 2014Steps to avoid bribery when client entertaining
6 Practical steps to help avoid liability under the Bribery Act 2010
1. Top level commitmentAll senior managers and directors must understand that they could be personally liable under … Read more
- August 12th, 2014Employment law update – TUPE and unfair dismissal
It’s time for MLP’s quick round up of the key talking points in employment law from last week and the hot topics included TUPE, unfair dismissal and harassment! Employment law … Read more
- August 12th, 20145 common misconceptions for not making a Will
When it comes to discussions around making a Will, there are many reasons that people give for not having done so already. Here, we correct some of the myths around … Read more
- August 11th, 2014Client entertaining or bribery?
The line between entertaining and bribery is not always obvious and can be very punitive. It is vital for businesses to understand the offences under the Bribery Act 2010 and … Read more
- August 11th, 20145 Common Misconceptions about family law – 2
Fathers have the same rights as mothers When a child is born, the mother automatically acquires “Parental Responsibility” for that child but the father may not. Parental responsibility covers all … Read more
- August 6th, 20145 Common Misconceptions about family law – 1
Over the next few weeks I’d like to share the five Common Misconceptions about family law. The first in our series is on the topic of… The Common Law Wife… Read more
- August 6th, 2014Dragon investment
I read in the paper that a couple of entrepreneurs have landed £50,000 in Dragon’s Den funding for their gourmet tea business. This funding from Kelly Hoppen was for a … Read more
- August 5th, 2014Employment law update – parental leave, tribunals and more
It’s time for MLP’s quick round up of the key talking points in employment law for the week ending 1 August 2014. Employment law news 70% of potentially successful Employment … Read more
- August 3rd, 2014UK estates will pay £530 million in ‘unnecessary’ Inheritance Tax in 2014
- August 3rd, 2014Lucien Freud’s son fails in challenge to £42 million secret trust
The distribution of Lucian Freud’s estate will remain a secret after one of his 14 children lost a High Court bid to challenge the validity of his Will this week.… Read more
- August 3rd, 2014Will claims triple as families choose DIY executors over solicitors